Takeaway for Freelancers and Creative Professionals

You can use copyright ownership rights to increase the chance you will be paid on time and in full. By drafting your service agreement so you own the copyrights and they do not transfer to your client until you are paid in full, you can create leverage over a client who wants to use your deliverable but tries to avoid paying you. While many clients who review your contract and notice that language will request you to amend the agreement so they own the copyrights outright, you can use their request as an opportunity to request more money up front to compensate you for your increased risk. If they do agree to the term and allow you to hold the copyright until paid, you have leverage if they do not pay, particularly if you file a copyright registration – if they use your work and it owned by you with a timely filed copyright registration, you are more likely have a viable lawsuit that may be eligible for statutory damages. If they want to use your work, that can be enough leverage to force them to stop ignoring your emails about that unpaid invoice.

Diving Deeper

Copyrights cover most creative works, and they are created automatically when you fix a work in a tangible medium (paper, clay, a video recording, a file on a hard drive, etc.). The copyrights in a work are usually owned automatically by their authors, no registration required (though registration does create additional, useful rights). One situation in which copyrights are not owned automatically by their authors is when the author is an employee and the employee creates the copyrightable work while the employee performs their employment duties. A freelancer is not an employee and so, by default, a freelancer owns their copyrighted works instead of the freelancer’s client. Most service agreements, whether drafted by the freelancer or the client, include terms that give copyrights in the freelancer’s work to the client regardless of whether the client holds up their end of the contract. Under these standard terms, the copyright transfer to the client is unconditional.

Another approach is to transfer copyrights to the client only after the client has completed payment in full. If the client does not pay the freelancer as required under the contract, the freelancer owns the copyrights. By itself, that does not make the freelancer whole because the deliverable is only valuable to the client. But it does give the freelancer leverage. If the client does not pay, the freelancer can credibly threaten the client with a copyright infringement lawsuit if the client uses their work. If the freelancer timely filed a copyright registration, the client may even be on the hook for statutory damages. This will force delinquent clients to choose between using the freelancer’s work without paying and risking litigation, paying the freelancer to complete the transfer of copyrights, or simply not using the work. If they do go ignore the risk and use the work without satisfying their payment obligations, you are likely to be in a much stronger position for litigation than you would be absent the provision that allows you to maintain copyrights until you are paid.

Many clients will balk at this term if they bother to read your service agreement, particularly if it is reviewed by your client’s lawyer. And that is fine – my suggested term is an unusual, requesting the standard term that gives copyright to your client unconditionally is not necessarily cause for concern. But you can use their requested amendment to negotiate a higher upfront fee to compensate for your reduced leverage if the client ultimately does not pay.